
Is the law firm's letter more than smoke?
Update of 2/28/10: See article here on Fannie Mae’s lawyers here.
————–
In response to my posting last week here, Fannie Mae made an effort to investigate the individual case I highlighted and to discuss my overall concerns. The point of the posting was not to focus on an individual case, but the larger policy at stake. I have been on many conference calls and listservs involving tenant advocates across the country, and there is undoubtedly a huge problem with lenders ignoring the law, or intentionally misleading tenants about their rights under the law. Thus far, federal agencies have not stepped in (only the Attorney General of Connecticut has done so to my knowledge, article here).
Fannie explained that they do their own investigation of the occupants of a home after they purchase it at a foreclosure sale. Fannie says they do not involve lawyers at all until they determine that the occupants do not appear to be covered by the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act (PTFA), and that the occupants are unable or unwilling to continue to rent on a month to month basis under their own month-to-month rental program. (I am concerned that Fannie attempts to encourage tenants to enter month-to-month leases instead of honoring the current ones as can be seen from their description on their website alone here.) Fannie claims it only has its lawyers get involved to begin eviction in these other rare circumstances.
I fail to see why it matters when Fannie lawyers get involved. It appears realtors contact occupants first, which have greater interests to remove occupants of the property so the property can be listed and sold (earning the relator a commission).
Of course the problem is Fannie’s letter highlighted in the posting says nothing of an investigation — it was sent to “Occupant” and plainly states: “If you are a Tenant in the property, please be advised that Fannie Mae also known as Federal National Mortgage Association has chosen not to continue your lease and therefore, you are no longer entitled to possession.” See copy here. Clearly, a statement like this sent by any lender to a bonafide tenant post-foreclosure would violate the language, meaning and intent of PTFA. When I inquired, Fannie admitted it did not approve the letter and has since spoken with its lawyers to ask them not use it again because it appears to contradict its policies (but I doubt that the law firm of Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel LLP drafted this letter just for Fannie Mae). Also in its defense, Fannie Mae correctly states that the occupant of the property that received the letter I highlighted was the former homeowner, so in this particular case there was no victim. But the document appears to be a form letter and a question remains whether it has or will be sent to a bonafide tenant on behalf of Fannie or another lender. (Update 2/26/10: It is not longer a question, the letter has been sent to bonafide tenants, see article here.)
Given that Fannie Mae has thousands of loans, thousands of foreclosures, and thousands of people working on them across the country, it might be far better if Fannie Mae would mandate what its lawyers do, as opposed to trust them.
Fannie Mae admits that it has learned of a variety of other problems in California, Utah and Connecticut and that much of the problem was implementation of its tenant policy, not the policy itself. Alternatively, Fannie Mae might want to consider changing counsel to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Fannie is spending our money afterall, and firing Barrett Daffin would get the attention of other foreclosure attorneys and vendors I would imagine. But there are undoubtedly many factors to be considered before taking such a step (it might not be Barrett Daffin’s fault for example).
Fannie Mae must not merely be able to blame its attorneys for its unwillingness or inability to control them, but I am hopeful Fannie Mae is in fact following the law and any evidence to the contrary disappears well before the law expires.
Filed under: Advice for Borrowers, National Foreclosure News
I am currently facing the same issue with a Fannie Mae repossessed home, in which I have been renting for the past 3-years.
I recently found out that the home that my wife and I have been renting was sold at sheriff sale and that Fannie Mae is the new owner. After 1-month of trying to find out who to speak with, getting bounced around from Fannie Mae to their lawyers and then to the listing agent I this week come home to find my 6-month pregnant wife crying because the local Sheriff posted an eviction notice stating that we had to vacate in 10-days. And yes, it is 22 degrees outside with about 2ft of snow on the ground.
We were never given any notice from Fannie Mae, their lawyers or the agent, which was supposed to happen per the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act. To my understanding the Act was to provide a 90-day notice. Also to my understanding Fannie Mae is supposed to provide us an option to lease on a month-to-month basis.
This is sad. We have paid our rent on time for the past 3-years, are currently in a month-to-month lease which meets the criteria of a “bona-fide tentant” and for the past 2-months my wife and I have not been able to enjoy our pregnancy as our home has been a continual worry. Stress we simply do not need. We have tried to do the right thing and contact Fannie Mae, their lawyers and their listing agent…only to still live with uncertainty. Everybody blames each other and are “EXTREMLY” rude. Do they understand we are the victums here?
If anybody can help, PLEASE do. This has been the most idiotic and most frustrating experience I have ever experienced.
I am sorry to read about your situation. It is gut wrenching. I just lost my home yesterday to forclosure in which the bank purchased it. If you dont mind me asking, was your home loan with Bank of America? I am scared to death to find out how long we have to move out. We have no rental property in our area that I would consider moving into as this time. Do they even attempt to negotiate with you after the foreclosure? I have not heard of the act you mention above and will research it. I wish you and your family the best and my heart goes out to you!
What is going on here? Fannie Mae cannot just blame their attorneys for missteps, they are supposed to be reviewing and approving anything sent out on their behalf.
I don’t know that not employing lawyers from the beginning is such a good thing. The realtors hired by the lenders aren’t bound by any enforceable rules–I liken them to used car salesmen–and lie to tenants, threaten them, and generally behave badly. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac follow other lenders in hiring these people to part tenants from their homes without following the law.